In biology class, the teacher draws a cucumber on the board: "Children, could someone tell me what this is?" Vovochka raises his hand: "It's a dick, Marivanna!" Maria Ivanovna bursts into tears and runs out. In a minute the principal bursts in: "Alright, what did you do now? It's something new every day! Yesterday you break a window, and today...," he looks around, "...and today you draw a dick on the blackboard?"

Who is Vovochka?

  + SUBSCRIBE
  + BUY

  + ARCHIVE
 
 
         
 
 
 
 

Art: Two of Russia's preeminent modern art personalities go head-to-head tackling the Big Questions. Ante up.
(Curated by
Marat Guelman)




Blue Noses

Over the past eight years, a group of artists called the Blue Noses have made their way from an abandoned bomb shelter in Siberia to the most famous museums in the West. The group got its name from the blue caps from water bottles that the artists once put on their faces as part of their work.

Alexander Shaburov and Vyacheslav Misin form the backbone of the Blue Noses. For the last several years, they have been studying the Russian subconscious, and there’s not a single mass media cliché or urban superstition that is likely to escape their scrutiny. Blue Noses turned a scrawny boy named Harry Potter into a Russian magician, Harry Shaburov, who fights prostitution and homosexuals. They mock public service announcements, offering the slogan “It’s hip to work” as a new fad. Shaburov and Misin are prone to poke fun of anything, from the Russian space program to their own bodies. Even the war on terror, which these days is turning into a TV game show, is not too sacred for the artists.

The Blue Noses stand for the larger accessibility of contemporary art, and therefore, they talk to viewers in the language of movie comedies and TV shows. Minimal scenery and maximum fantasy is their artistic motto.

Valery Koshlyakov

Moscow painter Valeriy Koshlyakov paints emblems of great cultural epochs on enormous pieces of cardboard. His works stun viewers with their compositional precision. The subjects of his cultural experiments range from Pompeii frescoes to Moscow constructivism, from Greek and Roman architecture to Stalin-era “classicism,” from Gothic cathedrals and Renaissance statues to contemporary architecture.

There is an explicit focus on archeology in his works manifested not only in their subject matter, but also in their formal qualities: they feel like the old time artifacts accidentally stumbled upon today. To a great degree, this effect is created by the artist's chosen medium: oil paint on cardboard. Under his brush, any piece of trash becomes an object for meditation.

A refined and appreciative connoisseur of art history, Koshlyakov conceives of the world in cultural, rather than temporal space. For him, emptiness is more important than presence insofar as it contains the very air of the epoch the artist is attempting to capture.


Questions:

How does the political situation in Russia affect your work?

Koshlyakov: In a positive way. Only since perestroika have I become a well-known artist in Russia and abroad. The current situation is good because it offers the chance for an even newer situation to emerge, one which is more attractive to the artist. What kind of situation? Nobody knows. But it is intriguing. 


Shaburov: When we visit exhibitions in the West, we are always confronted with the same questions: what's Mr. Putin's opinion of your work? Do you feel a lot of pressure from the KGB? Unfortunately, Putin and the KGB know as much about our art as Bush knows about Angela Merkel. If artists during the Cold War were concerned with important issues and their every sneeze was broadcast by “The Voice of America”, artists today are by and large marginalized. In the Soviet days, artists used to speak to either the powers that be or an imaginary Western audience. Now they are forced to communicate with ordinary people on their own terms. The state and the KGB neither restrain nor help them. Artists are reduced to petty litigations with equally marginal groups such as radical Orthodox believers. This is a very painful period. Formerly, you fought with the KGB; now, anyone can take offense and sue you. But artists are not willing to put up with it. They want to exaggerate their own importance and try to play the old games, but it's not panning out.


What is the difference between Western and Russian viewers?

Koshlyakov: The main difference between the Russian and the Western viewer is the former's ignorance of the culture of the second half of the 20th century. A lack of respect for it comes from the lack of knowledge.

Shaburov: An artist sends a message to an imaginary group of his or her peers. Ideally, these peers should be people everywhere. Essentially, the Western viewer does not differ from the Russian one. Both are completely devoid of private life. In place of private life are media personalities. Every day the viewers are visited by President Bush, Osama bin Laden or, say, Harry Potter. Mens’ brains are filled with the content of TV channels. At the very least, the function of artists is to attempt to clear their own brains of this junk. The only difference is that the Western viewer still has clichés regarding Russians.  In popular opinion, Russians are drunken peasants in fur hats á la Rasputin, who have leapt from the pages of Solzhenitsyn’s books.  Sometimes we take these clichés to their absurd extreme. If a Western curator seeks such images, we are happy to supply their idiotic needs.


 

   
ARTICLE TOOLS
 
 
 
 
 CONTRIBUTORS
 

Marat Guelman - the curator of this magazine’s art section is the founder of one of the first and most famous art galleries in post-Soviet Russia. He is one of the main forces shaping contemporary art in today’s Russia.

 
LINKS
 
www.guelman.ru
 
 
 
 

Tell us what you think:
Russia! magazine (Live Journal is surprisingly big here)
 
     
 
     
       
       

 

 

 

 

 Advertise with us  |  Privacy  | Contact us  | Subscribe to Russia!  |  Where to buy | About us |